How fast does the Super73 RX go?
Super73 – RX Electric Motorbike w/ 75+ mile max operating range & 28+ mph max speed – Rhino Gray. SUPER73 is an American lifestyle adventure brand and manufacturer of electric bicycles based in Irvine, California. It is best known for its product line of motorcycle styled electric bicycles, custom bicycle builds for celebrities, and high-profile e-bike collaborations.Why Are SUPER 73 Bikes So Expensive? SUPER 73 bikes don’t just look cool—they’re built to impress on every level. When you see one, you can tell it’s not your average e-bike. Everything about these bikes screams premium, from the materials to the design to the technology.
Why is Super73 so expensive?
Why are SUPER 73 bikes so expensive? SUPER 73 uses premium materials, advanced features, and customizable designs, which drive up the cost. Why Are SUPER 73 Bikes So Expensive? SUPER 73 bikes don’t just look cool—they’re built to impress on every level. When you see one, you can tell it’s not your average e-bike. Everything about these bikes screams premium, from the materials to the design to the technology.
How much does a Super73 RX cost?
Super73 has five different models available at the time of this review. The RX is the most premium and feature-rich out of the lineup, as well as the most expensive at $3,245 USD. The SUPER73-S2 has always been one of our most popular models; an easily recognizable classic.
Why is Super73 getting sued?
SUPER73 SUED FOR SELLING ILLEGAL eBIKES Setting the stage for a class action lawsuit as to what differentiates an eBike from an eMoto EV, Southern California-based Super73 made headlines during the Christmas break. The lawsuit, led by a California mother, claims Super73 misled consumers about the legality of their vehicles as e-bikes under state law.Because schools require all e-bikes to be registered, Whitman was told Super73s are not e-bikes and are illegal to ride. That was confirmed by the Central Marin Police Authority, Whitman alleges in the lawsuit. Had she known Super73s were illegal, the purchase would not have been made, according to the lawsuit.